Showing posts with label Vaccine. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Vaccine. Show all posts

Monday, March 20, 2023

Influenza Vaccination Starts a Phase-II? Clinical Trial

This is a straight forward clinical trial: people recently diagnosed with type 1 diabetes (in their honeymoon phase) will be given a standard flu vaccine to see if they will generate more of their own insulin as compared to people who don't get the vaccine.  They are using a Sanofi Pasteur vaccine, VaxigripTetra™, which has been used for over 6 years in people 3 years and older.  Previous versions of this vaccine have been in widespread use for decades.

They are recruiting 100 children (between 7 and 17) who have been recently diagnosed with T1D.  This study is a standard, high quality study: it is blinded, randomized, and has a placebo control group.  The primary end point is a C-peptide measurement (showing how much insulin the person is naturally producing), and there are several secondary and tertiary end points covering both patient results and internal immunology results.

They plan on gathering almost all of their data in the first year, but will monitor participants for safety issues for 5 years.  This study started in Dec-2022 and they hope to finish in June-2026. 

They are recruiting at four hospitals in Denmark: Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Aalborg University Hospital, Randers and Gødstrup regional hospitals.

Contact: Ole Frøbert, MD, PhD ole.fro@clin.au.dk
(There is additional contact information in the clinical trial registry.)

More Information

Clinical Trial Registration: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05585983

Discussion

For me, there are two interesting discussion points (and one uninteresting discussion point).

The obvious question is: why do the researchers think it will work? 

The researcher, Ole Frøbert, recently published a study showing that flu vaccine administered shortly after a heart attack reduces the ongoing risk of death.  Heart attacks come with high levels of inflammation and he believes that flu vaccination lowers this inflammation, causing the good outcome he saw.  While flu vaccination raises immune response in general, it also lowers specific inflammation signalling. It is well known that in T1D inflammation is an important path for the destruction of beta cells, causing the start of the disease (or at least the start of the symptoms and the need to inject insulin).  This researcher believes that flu vaccination lowers inflammatory signaling for the specific targets which are doing the damage in T1D.  These targets are discussed in the following paper:  https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34326232/

I have not found any previous research testing if flu vaccines have any impact on existing T1D.

But there is good evidence that people with T1D get flu more than others, which is why people with T1D should get yearly flu vaccinations.  A recent summary is here:  https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2021.667889/full and recommendations to do so from the CDC and the ADA are linked here: https://www.healthline.com/health/diabetes-and-flu-shot.

There are also many studies showing that flu vaccines do not cause T1D and are safe for people with T1D.  I have summarized these studies here:
https://cureresearch4type1diabetes.blogspot.com/2015/10/seasonal-flu-vaccine-and-type-1-diabetes.html
and here is the statement from the US National Academies of Science, with many supporting links:
https://www.nationalacademies.org/based-on-science/is-it-possible-for-the-flu-shot-to-cause-type-1-diabetes

The big issue for me, for this trial is: should I blog on it?  Is this research aimed at a cure or are they just hoping for better control, maybe using less insulin?  I blog on the first kind of research, but not the second.

When it is not clear if the researchers are aiming for a cure or a treatment, I look at what they are measuring as their primary result.  C-peptides are a measure of insulin production, so if that goes up, it can (at least potentially) lead to a cure.  On the other hand, blood glucose levels, A1c, and insulin usage are all treatment-oriented measures.  For this study, the primary outcome measure is C-peptides, so I'm treating it as cure focused.  They are also measuring blood glucose, A1c, and insulin levels, so if it turns out to have results that help treatment (but not cure), then I'll stop covering it.

The investigators certainly do not expect that the influenza vaccination will cure type 1 diabetes in this trial.  However, even a modest improvement in insulin generation would suggest a new research direction into a possible, future, vaccine based, cure.

The uninteresting discussion point is this: will it work?  

The answer is simple: we don't know; that is the whole purpose of this trial.  Since the trial is fully funded and underway, there is no reason to speculate as to whether or not it will work.  All we need to do is wait and see.  Guessing as to outcomes is a waste of time.

Note: I classify this study as phase-II? because it is the size of a phase-II study, but the treatment has never been tested on people with T1D.  Therefore, there is no T1D data available from a phase-I study, so I call it "phase-II?".  Officially, it is phase-IV, because it is being done after the vaccine is on the market. 

Joshua Levy
http://cureresearch4type1diabetes.blogspot.com
publicjoshualevy at gmail dot com
All the views expressed here are those of Joshua Levy, and nothing here is official JDRF or JDCA news, views, policies or opinions. My daughter has type-1 diabetes and participates in clinical trials, which might be discussed here. My blog contains a more complete non-conflict of interest statement. Thanks to everyone who helps with the blog.

 

Monday, July 11, 2022

Provention Bio Update

Provention Bio is a small biotech company targeting several autoimmune diseases.  It has two drug candidates which target T1D: teplizumab (PRV-031) and a coxsackievirus B vaccine (PRV-101).  This blog is a quick update on both of them.

Teplizumab (PRV-031)

I've blogged many time before and you can read them here (which includes more details than are included in this blog posting):
https://cureresearch4type1diabetes.blogspot.com/search/label/Teplizumab

Clinical trials done to date suggest that Teplizumab will delay the onset of T1D (the first symptoms) by about 3 years.  For example, if someone has 3 autoantibodies, they have a 35% chance of having symptoms of T1D within 5 years.  However, treatment with Teplizumab will change their chances to 35% but only after 8 years.

Provention has submitted this drug for FDA approval to delay the onset of T1D when used after 2 autoantibodies have been detected, but before symptoms of T1D are detected.  This is the first drug to be considered for marketing approval which would change the course of T1D (insulin treats the symptoms but it does not change the underlying disease).

The approval paperwork was submitted in Nov 2020.  In April 2021, the FDA identified a serious issue involving manufacturing changes impacting drug testing.  After much discussion between Provention Bio and the FDA, Provention submitted more data in Feb 2022 to address this issue.  The hope was that the FDA would approve it by Aug 2022.  However, in June 2022 the FDA announced that the decision would be made on 17 Nov 2022.  This was strictly a delay by the FDA; no additional data needs to be submitted.  In Oct 2022 there would be an announcement about required labeling and post-marketing studies (if required).

So the recent change is that we will now hear the decision on approval in Nov 2022 (with a strong hint in Oct 2022) instead of in Aug 2022 as we  had previously hoped.  From my point of view, this is a pretty small change.  There is no point in guessing if the FDA will approve it or not; in just 4 months we will know for sure.

Coxsackievirus B Vaccine Candidate (PRV-101)

Background: There is a theory that part of the trigger which causes the onset of T1D is infection by a virus.  Over the years, several common viruses have been investigated as possible triggers.  I've previously blogged on Polio family viruses and Rotaviruses as possible triggers for T1D.  Coxsackie B viruses are another family of viruses which might be a trigger.  If Coxsackie B viruses trigger T1D, then preventing infection might prevent (or delay) T1D, and we know that vaccines prevent infection.  So if this theory is correct, then a Coxsackie B vaccine could prevent or delay T1D.

Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coxsackie_B_virus

Provention Bio is testing a Coxsackie B vaccine in the hopes that it will prevent or delay T1D, and in March 2022 they announced the results of their phase-I study.   The two key findings were:

  1. There were no major adverse effects (ie. no bad side effects).
  2. Six months after treatment, between 90% and 100% of the people who received a high dose of vaccine had strong immunity to Coxsackie B viruses.

This is the official word on the future of this research: "The Company is currently exploring partnership opportunities to further the clinical development of PRV-101."  My translation of this sentence is (very roughly) "The results were good, but we don't have enough money to run a phase-II trial for a vaccine, so we need to partner with someone who does."

 

Joshua Levy
http://cureresearch4type1diabetes.blogspot.com
publicjoshualevy at gmail dot com
All the views expressed here are those of Joshua Levy, and nothing here is official JDRF or JDCA news, views, policies or opinions. My daughter has type-1 diabetes and participates in clinical trials, which might be discussed here. My blog contains a more complete non-conflict of interest statement. Thanks to everyone who helps with the blog.